CELL TOWERS - INCREASING EVIDENCE OF ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS

"More Towns Are Fighting Cell Tower Siting Close To Schools, Medical Facilities, And Residential Communities" 

By Jane Celltower

William Godstein is general counsel of the Maharishi University of Management, and affirmed to "Reconsider dangers of cell-phone towers."   The proposed construction by U.S. Cellular of an 85-foot-cell-phone tower in the small town of Fairfield gave area residents deep prompted concerns in regard to cell tower health  issues.  In turn, the company delayed construction and met with Mayor Ed Malloy, Maharishi University and a town committee, who gave alternative proposals.   On June 10, 20009, Jack Rooney, president and CEO of U.S. Cellular, sent a letter to the editor of the Fairfield Ledger denying the resumption further stating that "the tower's radio-frequency levels were well within the government's acceptable limits."  He also claimed, "there is no credible evidence that cell-phone towers pose a risk to people's health."

GROWING EVIDENCE MOUNTS OF THE ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS OF EMF AND RF EMISSION LEVELS 

National laws of Austria, Bulgaria, China, Hungary, Italy, Russia and Switzerland, among others, hold more stringent regulations in the cell phone industry than current laws in the United States.   FCC guilde lines, and cellular company compliance facts, do not hold accountable the fact adverse health effects have been documented at levels well below FCC guildelines.  Though this truth is not economically welcomed by technology company movers and shakers, adverse health effects include altered white blood cells in schoolchildren; childhood leukemia; impaired motor function, reaction time and memory; headaches; dizziness; fatigue; weakness; and insomnia.   

Based on epidemiological studies of people living near cell phone antennas in Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, Austria and Israel, these health problems are shown to exists.

"The European Parliament, representing all the member nations of the European Union, are 'concerned about the continuing uncertainties about possible health risks concerning magnetic radiation,' adopted a report on April 2, by vote of 599 to 22 providing that "the placement of antennas, mobile phone masts and high voltage power lines be negotiated between industry actors, public authorities and residents' associations in order to minimize health risks and legal-action cases.'"  

How safe are radiation levels?  This is a major question of research, and scientific inquiry.   The cell-phone wireless industry should show both responsibility, and interest of the possible adverse health affects to human life from cell phone towers. 

* The EMF'S Documented health risks for developing children,  (follow this link for references)

* EMF's cause harm to the medically fragile and those with implanted medical devices.  EMF's can cause pacemakers to malfunction, and can cause implanted defibrillators to malfunction.  Some insulin pumps can be adversely affected by EMF's.  And many people suffer from EMF sensitivity.  

http://www.devicelink.com/mem/archive/01/09/010.html

http://www.fms-corp.com/emfbuildings_hospitals.php4  

* People are hesitant to buy homes near cell phone towers due to the potential health risks.  Who wants a home near a 155 foot cell tower and dark-dangerous access road near by?  Cell phone towers have historically proven to reduce property values of the neighborhoods where they have siting rights (follow this link for more info on property value drops due to towers) .

Reference Source and Links:

No Mariowood Tower - 

 sites.google.com/.../nomarinwoodtower/more-towns-fight-cell-towers

FACTS - Families Against Cell Towers

________________________________________________________

DO CELL TOWER'S CAUSE HEALTH HAZARDS?

CELL TOWERS AND HEALTH, "FOLLOW THE ALAR PRINCIPLE - AS LOW AS REASONABLY ACHIEVABLE"

By Jane Celltower -  www.janecelltower.com (retrieved Jan. 6, 2022)

Safety and Cell Towers hold both pro and con opinion among experts.  Henry Lai, a professor in the department of bioengineering at the University of Washington in Seattle, has studied the subject of cell towers for more than two decades.  

"There is cause for concern," he said by e-mail.  "The majority of studies on RFR have been conducted on short - term exposures - i.e., a few minutes to several hours.  Little is known about the effects of long-term exposures such as would be experienced by people living near telecommunications installations, especially with exposures spanning months or years," he said in the report. 

Lai continues to explain, "Exposure of to the general population to RFR from wireless communication devices and transmission towers should be kept to a minimum and should follow the ALAR principle - as low as reasonably achievable." 

Within this same article, John Moulder, professor of radiation oncology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, thinks cell towers in the United States are well regulated and pose no proven health hazard.  "The cell sites have been measured in this country and Europe produce exposures to the public that are less than 1 percent of the public safety standards," he said.

SOURCE:  

http://www.radanindustries.com/eng/Press_Page/StPetetimes050811.htm

Planned Cell Tower Angers Neighbors

By Waveney Ann Moore

Published in the St. Petersburg Times: August 11, 2005

DR. GEORGE CARIO - TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND HEALTH EXPERT

WHAT ARE THE STANDARDS SET BY THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) FOR SAFE LEVELS OF RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) EXPOSURE?

Nolo article (32210), "EMF amd Radiofrequency Exposure from Cell Phones and Power Lines," confirms Federal agencies - such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), monitor and investigate issues related to RF exposure. The FDA acknowledges that it cannot entirely rule out the possibility of negative health effects caused by RF exposure from cell phone use. If it does exist, "It is probably small." The FDA advice was to limit the use of cell phones, using hands-free kits, which create a greater distance between the phone and the user. However it is also noted within this Nolo article reference, "experts caution that clipping the phone to a belt or clothing doesn't reduce exposure."

 As for cell tower's and cell antennas used for cellular and communication systems (PCS) transmissions, which can be found on towers, water tanks, or other elevated structures - including rooftops and the sides of buildings. There are FCC regulations, to which cell phone company providers must adhere to. However, research indicates the facts concerning Radio Frequency Exposure limits and requirements, both pro and con, are not fully known. We need, and should voice concern, for "independent, short and long term studies."

 WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS (EMF) ON HUMAN HEALTH?

There are concerns about living next to large power lines, and high EMF emissions causing Leukemia or other cancers. This problem extends to radio frequency (RF) exposure from wireless technologies like cell phones, cell phone towers, and GPS devices. Electric and magnetic fields (EMF) are produced by alternating electric currents found in electric transmission lines, plants that generate power, electric wiring, home and business appliances, cell phones, and other electric devices. Electric fields are measured in Volts per meter (V/m). EMF's at home or job - work measure from 5-10 V/m, while levels under a power trasnmission line may measure as high as 10,000 V/m. Walls do not block electromagnetic fields, so EMF from outside sources like power lines or nearby electrical towers can enter homes and workplaces. 

As you move away from the electric source exposure levels from electrical lines, towers, and cell phone stations are usually very low for most people. In 1979 a study examining the incidence of leukemia in children living close to power lines, noted public concern. One outreach against cell tower's being sat on, abutting, near schools, is PACT - www.expelcelltowers.org. 

There are also those who believe that EMF exposure at high levels can also cause other types of cancers, reproductive problems, developmental problems, and mental depression. Concerns have also now been raised about the possible negative health effects relating to the use of cell phones. In a Nolo article 

(www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/article-32210.html, titled: EMF and Radiofrequency Exposure form Cell Phones and Powerlines)a 1995 study by the American Physical Society reviewed reports and literature on EMF exposure, concluding there was no consistent, significant link between cancer and power line fields. 

And "In 1999, the National Research Council(part of the National Academy of Sciences) examined evidence from the EMF-RAPID program (a government program established in 1992 to study EMF exposure) and concluded that it was very unlikely the EMF's in the normal domestic or occupational environment produce negative health effects, including cancer." The Nolo article went on to confirm a 1999 study by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) which acknowledged that the existence of "weak scientific evidence that exposure may pose a leukemia hazard," could not entirely rule out the possibility that EMF exposure caused health problems. And many Scientist do believe that people exposed to high levels of EMF's,may develop health problems that are not linked to lower levels of EMF exposure. SOURCE: Nolo Legal Encyclopedia Article - 33210 - html.

  WHAT ARE THE FCC's LIMITS FOR RF EMISSIONS ON THE GROUD NEAR A CELL TOWER?

Nolo Legal Article 32210, "EMF and Radiofrequency Exposure From Cell Phones and Power Lines," has determined the limits for "RF emissions on the ground near a cell tower are measured in milliwatts per square centimeter and is 1 mW/cm2 for PCS towers and 580-600 mW/cm2 for cellular towers. While RF emissions from cell phone towers usually result in ground-level exposure that is typically below the safety limits recommended by the FCC, RF emissions on the ground within 100-150 feet of a cell tower, or on a roof-mounted cell tower, can exceed FCC limits.

 DO CELL PHONES REALLY CAUSE CANCER?

Source: Dr. Swiliing, PhD, Article Dated: November 10,2009. Contact Information for Dr. Jacob Swilling listed as: Email - healthylifeoptions@gmail.com. Address: 2787 Bristol Suite 100, Costa Mesa, CA. 92626. In July, the Pittsburge Cancer Center issued a nationwide warning about cell phones.

 The warning: Cell phones cause brain tumors. Dr. Gunner Heuser, a medical specialist in neurotoxicity, says there is little doubt that EMF exposure can cause health complaints. Gunner states, "In my experence, patients develop multisystem complaints after EMF exposure just as they do after toxic chemical exposure. Doctors have confirmed a terminal condition known as toxic 

encephalopathy. Which according to this reference article means, "toxic inflammation of the brain. Their cells have severe DNA damage. When these cells divide, they produce daughter cells with the same damage. And they will continue to do so until their bodies finally shut down and die. There is no treatment for broken DNA." Website Addess Reference: 

http://alternativecancerselfhelp.com/2009/11/do-cell-phones-really-cause-cancer/.

  WHO HAS DONE EXTENSIVE RESEARCH ON RF AND EMF EMISSIONS AFFECTING THE HEALTH OF INDIVIDUALS?

According to my research, Narendah Singh and Henry Lai (both highly respected Doctors), are the top two doctors in this special field of research. Both are biomedical researchers from the University of Washington. Drs. Singh and Lai reported around a decade ago (as of 2009), concerning cell phone radiation quickly causing DNA single-strand and double-strand breaks at well below the current federal safety level for exposure. The condition is called "micronuciel." 

Another often quoted specialist is Dr. George Carlo (YouTube video was at one time posted), a public health expert who conducted wireless technology research. Dr. Carlo noted that human blood exposed to cell phone radiation had a 300% increase in genetic damage in the form of micronuciel. He says that wireless technology is potentially the biggest health insult this nation has ever seen, bigger than cigarette smoking and asbestos. And that exposure to EMF is equivalent to exposure to the well known gamma waves of nuclear exposure.

 For additional information and educational support, I suggest my readers research the subject and these Doctor's.  As new research and findings are coming forth, confirming their findings and results.

  WHAT OTHER EMF HEALTH EFFECTS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED?

The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health has confirmed that workers exposed to high levels of EMF routinely have extremely high cancer rates.

IS HIGH EMF EXPOSURE COMMON?

The FCC has set exposure limits very high. Accordingly, Dr. Swilling's article titled, "Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer?," the FCC has set exposure limits so high that no matter how much additional wireless radiation is added to the national burden, it will always be within standards, says Norbert Hankin, chief of the EPA/s Radiation Protection Division.

 WHAT ARE MORTALITY RATES FOR THOSE EXPOSED?

Dr. Bill Curry is noted to have documented one tower that was irradiating homes at over 65 microwatts power square centimeter, which is within FCC guidelines of up to 580 microwatts. It has also been quoted within Dr. Swilling's article that during the Cold War, the Soviets bombarded U.S. Embassy workers with an average of exposure of only .01 microwatt per square centimeter. The illnesses at the embassy made international news. There is reported evidence of instantaneous spikes in mortality after cell phone service began in the 1990's. In some cities, the mortality rate went up by 10-25% in comparison with the typical death rate.

 HAVE THERE BEEN STUDIES ABROAD?

Yes, A French study found living close to a cell phone tower can cause extreme sleep disturbance, chronic fatigue, skin problems, brain disturbances, and cardiovascular problems.

 WHAT HAVE STUDIES ABROAD FOUND IN RELATION TO CANCER FINDINGS?

A German study found a high rate of cancer developing on average eight years earlier that national stat averages if you live within 1,200 feet of a cell tower. Most home owners with cell towers sites near or butting next to their property lines live very close to the cell tower. Spanish researchers found significant illness increases at radiation exposure of only 0.11 to 0.19 microwatts. Which is the end result of living within 1,000 feet of a tower. Which is a great deal less than FCC standards!

  WHAT ARE SOME ADDITIONAL HEALTH PROBLEMS IN RELATION TO LIVING CLOSE TO A CELL TOWER?

An Egyptian study found living close to cell towers resulted in nerve and psychiatric problems. It also caused debilitating changes in neurobehavioral function. Exposure results in a lower performance on tests for attention, short-term memory, and problem solving.

  ARE THERE STUDY RESULTS FOR WIMAX SYSTEMS?

Interesting facts concerning WIMAX systems. There was one WiMAX system powered up in Sweden, causing the local hospital ER to be flooded by calls from people wiped out by pulmonary and cardiovascular symptoms. According to technology reports, U.S. companies are rolling out the WiMAX wireless Internet access. Without an environmental health study, or a public health study, WiMAX will still hit the market.

HOW CAN WE BETTER PROTECT OURSELVES?

Aside from living a healthy life style, you can purchase test meters to check your local environment for toxic EMF. A few suggestions listed in one article were an Electrosmog Detector, usually available in Internet stores. The Trifield Meter and/or Alan Broadband meter. I cannot attest to their reliability.

  DOES LIVING NEXT TO A CELL PHONE TOWER OFFER ANY REDEEMING FACTORS?

Yes, individuals made to live next to cell phone towers, are in reality "Human Ginne-Pigs". What happens to us, determines what can happen to them. As Dr. Swilling stated, "But there isn't a cure for EMF damage to your DNA. There are no gadgets to protect you from cell phone radiation, no matter the claim. This is a disaster that you can only prevent, not treat." My advice? Limit cell phone use, using a cord phone instead. If you can, move far, far away from cell phone and power line towers.

_______________________________________________________________________

SYNTHIA ESTHER WEIGHS IN:

Not long ago the harm of chemicals produced from  "Asbesto Siding" and "cigarette smoking" were made to be silenced from those who sought to continue the money flow from such ill gained products.  Now, in 21st Society, we have the world hooked on wifi radiation technology - products that can and will, eventually prove far more dangerous.   Which is why many have spoken out against the 5G technology tower roll out currently occurring in our midst.

Knowledge is power.  Action or reaction is a choice.  As the "Burke's Triumph of Evil" quote goes, "All that is needed for the forces of evil to succeed is for enough good men to remain silent".   I can not remain silent.  Abuse is never justified.  "Silent No More", is a saying by many of those in the know of the grave and harmful  dangers imposed by wi fi, microwave - radiation technologies.

_________________________________________________

LIVING, WORKING, SOCIALIZING NEAR CELLPHONE TOWERS IS DANGEROUS TO YOUR HEALTH, AND WELFARE, SAYS BRITISH   ROYAL NAVEY AND SECRET SERVICE EXPERT BARRIE TROWER...

Retrieved from: www.janecelltower.com - 1-5-2022.

Mr. Barrie Trower- “ I joined the Royal Navy in 1960 and I specialized in microwave warfare, radar which obviously uses microwave but they don’t just teach you radar they teach you all about microwaves and “other uses” so I understood about microwave warfare and how it can damage people how it can harm people, and when I finished with the Royal Navy , uh, I was also a diver in the Royal Navy and microwaves are used in underwater mines as booby traps, you can , which what actually got me interested, because I was actually taking a bomb to pieces underwater and it was too complicated, and I brought it to the surface and my partner that was on the surface said ‘…Don’t be an idiot, take it back down…’ he said, ‘…if somebody’s beaming you with microwaves the will go right though you and as you open the casing trigger a photo electric cell and it will blow ( everyone) all of us up, and he said if it does not go through to the bomb it will aim at your head and make you make a mistake…” and that’s really got me interested from that point because I thought from that point how can microwaves going into your brain make you make a mistake.

And I asked a lot of questions, I have a very curious brain. And the Forces (British Forces), they are very good at explaining things and telling you things, so I did that and I also did a medical course while I was into (it) to help me understand everything, and when I left, a small part of my job was to question captured agents spies, terrorists, because microwaves then were used as weapons as they are today.

It is a perfect stealth weapon, and when Governments don’t like a group of people for instance the ladies who protested Greenom common in England the American Missile base, they camped (set up tents overnight). (United Kingdom) We microwaved Catholics in Northern Ireland to make them sick, it goes on all over the world. And It’s a weapon you don’t know you’re being targeted, because the dose is very very low which is actually more dangerous than a high dose, It’s very very low and it may take a year or two, but you can , you can cause neurological damage and cancers with low level microwaves you can make all your opponents sick ,

 it’s a perfect weapon for a government to use, so that was going on, and I gathered all the information about that from people who were captured from that from other countries to find out what technologies they had what pulse frequencies they used but as…

Australia…. it was only a small part of my work, but because I was highly trained in it and I was useful, it just became a part of my working structure along with master criminals and terrorists and all sorts of people I found incredibly interesting actually to talk to, very very interesting and then when I left there I took a job teaching and I taught advance level physics and I specialized in nuclear and atomic radiation and again microwaves; I’ve just always been in microwaves, and then it was a doctor, I went to see a doctor once as most teachers do with a sore throat, and he said he said, as most doctors do it’s viral, there’s nothing I can do for you, and I was leaving, and he said ‘Hang on Barrie he said, he said you’re a physicist, and I said “yeah” and he said ‘can you explain something?’-

“He said, ‘I went to a house that had a cot death (Crib Death AKA [SIDS – Sudden Infant Death Syndrome] ) five years ago and the family moved and a new family moved in they had a new baby the cot was in exactly the same place and there was another cot death (Crib DEATH [SIDS] and he said five years apart and he said there is a transmitter the other side of the child’s bedroom wall, could the transmitter cause the cot death? (Crib Death AKA [SIDS – Sudden Infant Death Syndrome] )? and I said I don’t know I said but I’ll look into It .

And then I found out that microwaves were involved and I knew what microwaves did and a while later I went back to the doctor and I wrote a paper on it and I said there is your answer microwaves can cause cot death (Crib Death AKA [SIDS – Sudden Infant Death Syndrome] ) by two or three mechanisms there is your answer, and then for some reason he told somebody who told somebody and people started phoning me up and writing to me saying can you explain this or can you help with that, I’ve never actually asked anyone if I can do anything they always come to me and then the police came to me and said we’re getting this new TETRA Airwave System (It’s all over Florida because of Buckingham Air field on Buckingham Road ) , We don’t understand what’s happening can you read all this scientific rubbish and just put it into Janet and John (P’s and Q’s) and just tell us and I said of course I can, so that was published, and since then it’s snowballed and snowballed and snowballed, and now I receive up to one thousand connumicas (communications) a week, from various countries, various people, and I can’t handle it so and I am here now because someone asked me to come here. WiFi ? –

I think anyone that puts WiFi into a school should be locked up for the rest of their life I really do. I think they are not fit to walk on the surface of this planet, because they have not looked at the research and whatever incentive they have it is not worth the genetic problems that parents are going to face with their children when they are born. And if you think of a single parent; a mother who has a genetically deformed child that that particular mother will feel guilty because she gave birth, she will feel guilty and she will be worried ever single second of ever every single day for her life, she will worry that the child won’t marry, if the child can marry she’ll worry that the children will carry the disease; which they will, she will worry when she dies who will take care of them, so you are condemning both the family and the children to a lifetime of absolute ‘hell’; and this is already published and it is available to look up and it’s what I called “Intentional Ignorance”.

They are offered some sort of incentive, and they think this is going to be good, we will have it, now the problem is imagine you are a 15 year old school girl.  All of the 400,000 eggs in your ovaries were with you at birth, they are not fully developed but they are with you. They are 10 times more susceptible to radiation than all of the other DNA in the body, and scientists don’t realize that, they don’t read all of the papers as I do. So you have this highly susceptible genetic material which is going to make your children, and you are irradiating it, because Wi-Fi are transmitters as well as the routers as well as the ones either side of you (your neighbors with Wi Fi and the Clubhouse Radio Antenna in River Forest in Fort Myers shores Florida, lee county Florida, as well as the Wi Fi on top the Street lamps installed on top of Street lamps all over the USA)

They are all transmitting this height through your ovaries. So you are risking the damage the DNA damage of your child ever time you sit down and you use Wi Fi. And its like saying if I smoke a cigarette, which one will cause the damage? The answer is I don’t know. It could be the one today. So you now have a child that has a probability of being genetically damaged. But the real damage is when that child grows up you have genetic material in your ovaries which could be damaged.

Now the real problem comes so you have a child that could be born genetically damaged .. but the real problem comes, when you become pregnant if you are a teacher or mature student (female student) and you become pregnant because the embryo Inside your womb in the first 100 days all of those 400,000 eggs are forming in your embryo your (female ) child’s ovaries. So your (female) child could be born with genetically damaged eggs, and the main thing about the eggs of the ovaries of your child is that they have absolutely no protection, it has not been developed yet.

We have a natural protection against microwaves, it was developed since the stone age against thunder storms and massive amounts of radiation coming into our body. But in your embryo your uterus in the fetus where your child is developing for the first 100 days in the ovaries (of the female fetus) the eggs do not have that protection so they are at maximum risk from radiation. And for the first month or so you would not even know you were pregnant, you would not even be taking precautions. That is the main danger area.

So you give birth to a daughter but her ovaries are not contaminated. She may be normal or she may be genetically damaged. But her ovaries are at the most risk, so when your daughter grows up and she becomes pregnant and has a baby, this is where one of these eggs will be fertilized and comes out (genetically damaged) so the real damage here is your grand children. That is where it is going to show most. And we already see this in animals that have reproductive cycles of a year of two years or three years, we’re already seeing this and it has been published by veterinary schools and vets, and scientists, so we know this happens.

And it’s also been documented in the cold war when women were deliberately microwaved . So we know it does happen. The documents are there. 

And what you are risking by putting Wi Fi into schools is the future generations of all of these girls. But it gets worse, because this particular DNA- the mitochondrial DNA inside you and the DNA inside you the mitochondrial DNA you can trace unchanged to your mother her mother her mother right the way back to the beginning of the human race in Africa the stone age- you can trace your ancestors if you could right back to the very first lady; it is unchanged- the mitochondria (DNA) and that is being unchanged in your children. Which means if you damage it, your child could be genetically damaged then her child and her child and her child- forever.

You are condemning the future generation of every single child, until there are no more lines left in the female in your family. You must stop- a female must stop producing children for this to stop. So when you put WiFi in schools what your saying is for the sake of a little bit of money that saves getting the workmen in to drill holes through the walls to feed the cable because It’s cheaper, were just going to put Wi Fi in but you can have genetically damaged children for the rest of your families career (history).. that’s what we’re (they) are saying.”

By Synthia Esther

Jan. 6, 2022 

As I desire to remain educated, alert, awake, and aware.  I have a deep gratitude for Dane Wigington's  geoengineeringwatch.com warning outreach and touted wake calls,  As he is alerting all who will listen, of very present and real science and technology dangerous hazards and infractions. 

  While I agree with him on many counts about geoengineering, (also termed chemtrails by some), Agenda 21 - Sustainable development control  programs.  And readily know there are vast toxic chemicals being sprayed into our air space and sky, creating and causing humanity serious health and welfare issues.  As well as foundational earth infractions (yes, our trees and many food source yields are dying), due in large part to resulting weather manipulation infractions. 

 I take issue with Mr. Wigington, when I hear him  refer to church - spiritual institutions and leadership, addressing all by way of blanket statements, filled with negative scope and opinion.   Confirming when he addressed such contacts they  all negated his voice and reason, regarding the worlds toxic geoengineering dangerous, hazardous, problems. 

In reality, I readily know there are other Christians  like myself, who have been addressing these very serious world domination issues/problems for a very long time.  I personally have been dedicated in addressing science and technology dangers and infractions, offering ministry educational outreach and resource on the world wide web since, 2010.

RELIGIOUS - SPIRITUAL LEADERSHIP DUTY OF CARE RESPONSIBILITIES:

On Climate Engineering News Questions and Answers - Dated Feb. 3, 2021, Dane Wigington answered the following question posed by a man named Dwayne.  Who had asked him about Religious and Spiritual leaderships reasons and reactions towards the geoengineering - earth weather manipulation, health and welfare subject matter.  And their noted negations of address concerning "...the destruction of our World by the Supreme Deity at this time. What do Christians believe?  Is their overall silence and inaction an assault - a testament of what they believe?"  

Wigington answered Dywane, stating he too was deeply concerned and troubled about the churches lack of duty of care.  Confirming he had approached every major spiritual institution - leader in North State where he lives and all of these so called spiritual leaders from a great variety of traditions responded the same way, stating in part:

"We don't need your information on this subject.  We don't have to worry about it because it is all in big hands." 

 Which I took to surmise, they meant all was under God's control,  which is true, for God is sovereign.  However, humanity has been given "dominion mandates" by God, as joint  junior custodians of all He has created (Genesis 1;26-28; 2:5).  Which obligates us all to take care of God's very good creations!

Wigington, then gave Dwayne answer (and a full audience response on the genoengineeringwatch.com website), which I retrieved in December of 2021.  Only to issue forth a "challenge" of sorts, in very negative terms, as he boldly confronted religious leaders and institutions, stating in part:

"Show me in your scripture where it says once a truth like this has been pointed out to you where it is OK to hide behind a pulpit and preach to your choir without calling them to action to address this. Show me in your scripture where it says that's OK.  And none of them could do that.  All of them are ashamed into taking the data, which I'm sure they latter threw in the trash can and the degree of hypocrisy that is occurring with in spiritual institutions right now, is truly troubling." 

 Wigington then further asked in part:

 "Is it OK to hide behind a pulpit and guard and defend - 501.C3  status?" 

No it is not!  And I have personally heard (mostly during political elections) more than one pastor state to their congregation that they could not say what or how they truly felt  concerning certain things, due to 501 C3 legal guidelines.  Let it be known that there are many Christian's who oppose corporate 501 C3, tax - state controls.  As well as those in the flock who remain uneducated concerning such matters,  There are also those who simply don't care. 

Wigington additionally confirmed in his answer to Dwayne,  "... that the Pentagon was missing 30 trillion dollars since the late 1990's."  That Central bankers and black opps, and those who print money and fund militaries, all play a part.  As climate engineering is about power and control, and it always has been."

One has to ask in relationship to all such educational - political news reporting. 

Are Religious, Faith Based Organizations being used in overt and covert ways and sways in order to gain support of questionable Government world issues and related power and control infractions? 

Of course they are, and have been for quite some time!  

Let us not forget that It was Jesus who drove the wickedly vexing money changers out of the Jerusalem Temple with a self made whip! - (John 2:13-16).   And it was Jesus who said, they had made the Temple a "den of thieves" - (Mark 11:17). 

Jesus despised the practice of making money pay off of God's good Holy will and intentions.  He opposed any and all subversions of religious worship being turned into personal profit, and greed hungry commerce,  We should follow His reverent opposition example and all do likewise.

Synthia Esther, copyright. All Rights Reserved.

_____________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES HARMFUL CAUSES AND EFFECTS 

BY SYNTHIA ESTHER - January 5. 2022 

We who are alive on planet earth during these troubling times, are here for a God appointed time, season and reason,  For it is our generation that sits in the midst of a science and technology revolution - evolution, that proceeds all ages past.  The question that stands forth as prominent in my mind is:  

Why has humanity  welcomed and embraced science and technologies harmful effects, without question or rebuke? 

I am reminded of the 1969 American top single hit song sung by the rock duol, Denny Zager and Rick Evans. 

"In the year 2525, if man is still 

alive, if woman can survive, they may find...". 

A toxic and harmfully dangerous, controlled world, is what they will find!  The current roll out of 5G technology is only the beginning of our world's sad, dystopian fate.  

Our future generations will suffer, ponder and wonder: 

"What were they thinking?  Why did they allow all such dooming toxicity to prosper and flourish?  Why didn't they do something to stop science and technologies destruction all consuming snares? "

Because all was falsely promoted by government, leadership, the media and even financial and consumer experts, as a very good thing.  When nothing could be further than the truth!  

AS THE RELIGION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MERGE, EXPOTENTIAL PROSPERITY WILL FLORISH.  "SHOW ME THE MONEY" ADDICTION LUST, HAS ALWAYS BEEN A SIN TEMPTATION SNARE, WHICH THE BIBLE PROCLAIMS IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL - (1st  TIMOTHY  6:10).

THE FOLLOWING IS A SHORT LIST OF 5G HARMFUL EFFECTS:

The World Health Organization (WHO), along with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified all radio frequency radiation (of which mobile signals are a part) as "possibly carcinogenic." - (bbc.com/news retrieved 1-5-2022).

   The $25 million National Toxicology Program noted that radio frequency radiation like that used by cell phones, can cause cancer.  

  _____________________________________________

Low, mid, high spectrum's increase has many known dangerous side effects including but not limited to (according to many sources):

 DNA single and double strand breaks, oxidative damage, disruption of cell metabolism,  increased blood brain barrier permeability,  melatonin reduction,  disruption to the brain glucose metabolism,  generation of stress proteins.  

5G by design is to make use of higher frequency bands,  As cited by bbc.com/news retrieved 1-5-2022: 

"...5G networks rely on signals carried by radio waves - part of the electromagnetic spectrum-transmitted between an antenna or mast and you cell phone.  We're surrounded by electromagnetic radiation all the time - from television and radio signals, as well as from a whole range of technologies, including mobile phones, and from natural sources such as sunlight.  5G uses higher frequency waves than earlier mobile networks, allowing more devices to have access to the internet at the same time and at faster speeds. 

"These waves travel shorter distances through urban spaces, so 5G networks require more transmitter masts than previous technologies, positioned closer to ground level."

I WOULD BE REMISS NOT TO MENTION EFFORTS MADE BY SOME GOVERNMENTS TO STOP AND BLOCK 5G TECHNOLOGY FROM GOING FORWARD :

In April 2019, the city of Brussels in Belgium blocked a 5G trial because of radiation rules.[96] In Geneva, Switzerland, a planned upgrade to 5G was stopped for the same reason.[97] The Swiss Telecommunications Association (ASUT) has said that studies have been unable to show that 5G frequencies have any health impact.[98]

According to CNET,[99] "Members of Parliament in the Netherlands are also calling on the government to take a closer look at 5G. Several leaders in the United States Congress have written to the Federal Communications Commission expressing concern about potential health risks. In Mill Valley, California, the city council blocked the deployment of new 5G wireless cells."[99][100][101][102][103] Similar concerns were raised in Vermont[104] and New Hampshire.[99] The US FDA is quoted saying that it “continues to believe that the current safety limits for cellphone radiofrequency energy exposure remain acceptable for protecting the public health.”[105] After campaigning by activist groups, a series of small localities in the UK, including Totnes, Brighton and Hove, Glastonbury, and Frome, passed resolutions against the implementation of further 5G infrastructure, though these resolutions have no impact on rollout plans.[106][107][108] - As Retrieved from Wikipedia - 1-5-2022.

  5G technology roll out is warned by some scientists to also be a cause of alarm due to:

 security problems, electromagnetic - weather forecasting interference issues, aviation - FAA problematic dangers, satellite interference - as a number of 5G networks deployed on the radio frequency band of 3.3-3.6GHz is expected to cause interference with C-Band satellite stations, which operate by receiving satellite signals at 3.4-4.2GHz frequency.  

Wi-Fi :

The US and Eu, have regions of 6GHz band use, which would upen up unlicensed applications, permitting the deployment of 5G-NR unlicensed.   5G version of LTE in unlicensed spectrum, as well as Wi-Fi 6e.  However, such interference could occur with the co-existence of different standards in the frequency band - (Wikipedia - Retrieved 1-5-2022).

FIRST RESPONDER INTERFERENCE: 

CELL PHONE CALL INTERFERENCE HINDERS POLICE AND FIRE RESCUES

By Jane Celltower

Research Source:

CBS NEWS - Tech - April 6, 2004.

Washington, Associated Press Release - Johnathan D. Salant

Cell phones are causing dangerous problems for firefighters and police officers when they can't use their radios to issue help and response calls due to interference from cell signals.   This article was of particular interest to me, due to the same problems with my cell phone coverage since the T- Mobile cell tower in my backyard has been active.   Dropped calls, wobble and metallic sounds, echo effect, can't hear the person I called, in and out coverage has become a major source of perplexion.  I mentioned this to my call phone carrier manager who seemed quite concerned.  "If this is happening to you, this affects others.  FCC needs to be made aware of all interference of coverage and calls."  

Cambridge, Mass. , a Boston suburb is one of the areas that has had problems with past cell phone interference.   The discovery was made when an officer responded to a fight at an apartment and had to walk to the other side of the high-rise to call for backup.  Another incident was reported when an officer responding to a burglar alarm could not call for help as he approached the building.  The delays were reported with Cambridge Fire Chief Gerald Reardon concluding, "In both incidents, the delays didn't cause any major problems for officers, but the potential is there."  Chief Reardon oversees the city's entire public safety radio system, "If equipment needs to be repaired or upgraded, we have no problem doing that.  This is beyond our control.  It's a worry."

Ernest Mitchell, president of the International Association of Fire Chiefs, was reported to be even more pessimistic stating, "Thankfully, no one has died...But it's only a matter of time."   Mitchell is the fire chief in Pasadena, California.  Radios used by police and firefighters, as well as other first responders broadcast on the same 800 megahertz broadcast system as cell phones.  An example used was, "If a radio dispatch is made at 850 MHz near a cell tower broadcasting at 851 MHz, the radio signal can get drowned out.  

Further confirmed was the fact, "It's unclear how many municipalities are affected, but the problem is serious enough that police and firefighters have been urging the government to come up with a fix. "

Nextel Communications has frequencies that are interspersed among those belonging to public safety, with their phones causing the most interference.  Nextel was assigned the frequencies by the Federal Communications Commission before the massive cell phone boom, when it was thought that the 800 MHz spectrum could handle both public and private cell phone needs.   Solutions were made for the Nextel to divide the 800 MHz band, giving one section to public safety agencies and another to cell phone companies.  The FCC studied the problem and gave voice for the Nextel plan.

DUI ATTORNEYS WEIGH IN:

Seveal DUI attorneys ( www.1800duilaws.com  posts an RF Interference  article), still voice concern and legal right, stating that readouts for alcohol intoxication levels have been known to be affected by Radio Frequency Interference.   Legal issues are not out of the question, as the recent Toyota car accidents that have been plagued with problems (claimed by Toyota to be caused by faulty floor mats), are now being investigated for electronic problems with excelleration caused by, you guessed it, "Radio Frenquency Interference."  

TOYOTA CAR ACCIDENTS COULD BE DUE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS INTERFERENCE

By Jane Cell tower

Research Resource:

CBS, FOX NEWS

 Are Electrical Fields Interference the cause of Toyota cars problem with sudden acceleration?  According to a CBS news report on February 23, 2010, "As representatives of Toyota appeared before a House Subcommittee this week to testify on the automaker's safety measures and the recent recalls of more than eight million vehicles - due to many cases to instances of sudden unintended acceleration - a debate has been revived over the effects of electromagnetic fields on cars' electrical systems."  

In a CBS News exclusive, Sharyl Attkison reports that some of Toyota's surging vehicles were due to computer and electronic issues - something the company has know since 2005 and publicly denied. 

Fox News reported on Saturday, March 27, 2010, that "Electic Grids" are once again being researched, after a Lexus malfunction accident killed passengers, right after the car went drove under power lines.  Electromagnetic fields (EMF's), are produced in varying waves and frequencies due to their source of power which includes, but is not limited to, electric currents, power lines, radio and microwave antennas, airport radar, and cell phones and cell towers.  As the theory goes, CBS reports, 

"...electric signals can briefly interfere with the electronic controls of cars.  As Toyota issued recalls over the matter of sudden unintended acceleration - blaming faulty pedals or obstructive floor mats - the possibility of interference by EMF's with Toyota's electrical systems has been raised." 

LET US NOT FORGET THOSE WHO SUFFER ELECTROMATIC SENSITIVITY:

ELECTRICAL MAGNETIC FREQUENCY SENSITIVITY - THE DIRTY ELECTRICITY LINK

By Jane Celltower - www.janecelltower.com

May 2015 (retrieved Jan. 6, 2022)

Since the 1996 roll out of the Telecommunications Act, cell phone towers and smart meters, have continued in expansion.  And so have the health problems of many who, like me,  are unfortunate to have to live in the rays of "dirty electricity and harmful radiation".  Electromagnetic sensitivity being on the rise, many people are opting out of having a smart meter attached to their home.  I did so,  and am made to pay a monthly price increase as a result.  This extra cost I was told, is to pay for the manpower it takes for someone to come by and read my meter. 

American, Arthur Robert Firstenberg, is in my opinion, the leading activist for those suffering the effects of "electromagnetic hypersensitivity".  He is founder of "Cellular Phone Task Force" (www.cellphonetaskforce.org) and author of the book, "Microvaving Our Planet; The Environmental Impact of the wireless Revolution" (1997).  

Born May 28, 1950, Firstenberg was a Westinghouse Scholar, who received a BA in mathematics from Cornell University in 1971.  He was unable to finish his pursued medical degree, due to electromagnetic hypersensitivity. 

Green Bank, West Virginia,  has become a noted "radio free quiet zone" as home to the Green Bank Telescope, which is the worlds largest steerable radio telescope (wikipedia - retrieved 5/9/2015).  There are those who suffer electromagnetic hypersensitivity who have relocated to Green Bank, finding a safe haven home refuge, free of cellular radiation within this quiet zone border. 

The Problem:

Toxic radiation we can't see, is being both seen and felt, as our bodies, earth - nature, animals, birds, wildlife, suffer and show the evident, toxic results.  Headaches, body aches, pain and fatigue, dry skin changes, constant dry eyes, lack of sleep,  being some of my recurrent, troubling symptoms.  I am not alone, as there are now many who claim much the same end results, (dirty electricity and electromagnetic radiation -EMF), effects no two people the same way. 

The Reaction

:
 More people having to receive and pay for additional health and medical care (cancer being one such noted health problem), due to EMF harm.  Which provides an increased profit margin for those in the medical and health fields.

The Solution:

Place the worlds health and welfare first, above the almighty financial dollar.  Spread the word through peaceful activism, providing free educational insight, so the world takes notice of the health harm and detriment.  The Internet, Cell phones, televisions, microwaves, are all common, modern conveniences.  One has to ask themselves, "Is their use worth the risk?"